Leonard R. Kahn v. General Motors Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The absence of even a single limitation of [a claim] from the accused device precludes a finding of literal infringement.”
• “The absence of even a single limitation of [a claim] from the accused device precludes a finding of literal infringement”
• “[I]n writing a claim in means-plus-function form, a party is limited to the corresponding structure disclosed in the specification and its equivalents.”
• obviousness may not be established using hindsight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).