Leonard Moore v. Appliance Direct,Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “reasonable jurors could differ as to whether [the defendant] was an employer under the requirements of the FLSA”
• explaining that § 216(b) “creates a separate, discretionary standard of damages for retaliation claims”
• upholding personal liability for retaliation claim where individual is considered “employer”
• upholding personal liability for retaliation claim where individual is considered “employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).