Skip to main content
· 5/24/1995

Leonard J. Olmstead v. United States

Citations

  • 55 F.3d 316
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12592
  • 1995 WL 313696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n the absence of changed circumstances of fact or law, we will not reconsider an issue which was already decided on direct appeal.”
  • \A Section 2255 motion is neither a recapitulation of nor a substitute for a direct appeal.\
  • \A Section 2255 motion is neither a recapitulation of nor a substitute for a direct appeal.\
  • issues that were raised on direct appeal may not be reconsidered on a § 2255 motion absent changed circumstances of fact or law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eschbach, Posner, éschbach, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.