Leon Robinson and Shanika Robinson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a person may not be convicted for aiding and abetting a crime when he is merely “aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk” of an element of that crime
• applying traditional aiding and abetting liability principles to \while armed\ offenses
• “It is well-established that this court ‘may direct [or allow] the entry of judgment for a lesser included offense when a conviction for a greater offense is reversed on grounds that affect only the greater offense.’ ” (alteration in original
• ―Wilson-Bey rejected the proposition (and any jury instruction incorporating it
• same, noting that “we often have stated” as much

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).