Skip to main content
· 3/8/2013

Leon Kendall v. Daily News Publishing Co

Citations

  • 716 F.3d 82
  • 41 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1493
  • 2013 WL 856433
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Congress’s recent elimination of the Third Circuit’s certiorari jurisdiction over decisions of the Virgin Islands Supreme Court does not affect, at a minimum, certiorari petitions filed before the effective date of the jurisdiction-stripping act
  • holding that Congress’s recent elimination of the Third Circuit’s certiorari jurisdiction over decisions of the Virgin Islands Supreme Court does not affect, at a minimum, certiorari petitions filed before the effective date of the jurisdiction-stripping act
  • “[I]f mere knowledge were sufficient to find defamatory intent, then actual malice could be found no matter how unlikely it is that a listener would interpret the statement as having the defamatory meaning.”
  • “Mere disbelief of a defendant’s statement ordinarily is insufficient to establish malice.”
  • “In ordinary defamation cases, intent to defame can be established solely through knowledge that the statement was false. After all, if the defendants knew that the statement made was false and defamatory, then they must have intended to defame.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Hardiman, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.