Skip to main content
· 11/2/1994

Leo Goldman and Pauline Goldman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 39 F.3d 402
  • 74 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6923
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that tax expert lacked expertise in the oil and gas industry
  • finding taxpayers' reliance on accountant who was also sales representative for investment unreasonable because of inherent conflict of interest
  • upholding negligence penalties where expert relied on had “an inherent conflict of interest”
  • taxpayer could not reasonably rely on professional advice of someone known to be burdened with an inherent conflict of interest--a sales representative of transaction
  • reliance on advice from person who signed the limited partnership agreement at issue as the partnership’s sales representative was unreasonable
  • taxpayer could not reasonably rely on professional advice of someone known to be burdened with an inherent conflict of interest—a sales representative of the transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Mahoney, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.