Leo F. Dermota v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant waived double jeopardy objection to multiple punishments for the same offense by pleading guilty to separate offenses “freely, voluntarily, and accompanied by his attorney”
• distinguishing the case on the facts because in the precedent upon which the defendant relied, the defendant was convicted of the two offenses, which the court held violated double jeopardy, while the defendant in Dermota pleaded guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).