Skip to main content
· 11/6/1995

Lenz v. Julian

Citations

  • 657 N.E.2d 712
  • 212 Ill. Dec. 511
  • 276 Ill. App. 3d 66
  • 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implying that the defendant would be personally responsible for a money judgment against him, even though, unbeknownst to the jury, the State had agreed to indemnify him
  • implying that the defendant would be personally responsible for a money judgment against him, even though, unbeknownst to the jury, the State had agreed to indemnify him
  • dismissal for failure to state a claim operates as an adjudication on the merits
  • no emergency where state trooper knew chase of suspect had been abandoned and officer did not know the location of the suspect, but intended to cross state lines to continue pursuit he was not authorized to undertake
  • dismissal for failure to state a claim operates as an adjudication on the merits
  • no emergency where state trooper knew chase of sus­pect had been abandoned and officer did not know the location of the suspect, but intended to cross state lines to continue pursuit he was not authorized to under­take

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.