Skip to main content
· 6/27/2014

Lenz v. Central Parking System of Neb.

Citations

  • 288 Neb. 453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assignments of error were -4- broad enough to encompass variety of claims, but arguments limited to specific issues were only ones addressed on appeal as properly raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.