District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/5/1986
Lentz v. State
Citations
- 498 So. 2d 986
- 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- use of standard jury instruction on insanity which improperly placed burden of proof on defendant was fundamental error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-21· cited 87×
- Rosso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-14· cited 28×
- Lentz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-08· cited 7×
- Stanley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-17· cited 3×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-29· cited 1×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 419×
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida· 1984-01-12· cited 147×
- Goodman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 100×
- Pait v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-11· cited 83×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-30· cited 55×
- Yohn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-11· cited 53×
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-04-26· cited 40×
- Morton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-26· cited 20×
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-12· cited 13×
- Enriquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-20· cited 9×
- Snook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-05· cited 9×
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-06· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.