D. New Jersey· 1/11/1999
Lentz v. Mason
Citations
- 32 F. Supp. 2d 733
- 43 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 297
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3424
- 1999 WL 16319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even failed sale contracts constitute admissible evidence of fair market value
- stating that motions for reconsideration “are not an opportunity to argue what could have been, but was not, argued in the original set of moving and responsive papers”
- “An ‘objection’ that . . . simply summarizes what has been presented before, is not an ‘objection’ as that term is used in this context.”
- “Only dispositive factual matters and controlling decisions of law which were presented to the court but not considered on the original motion may be the subject of a motion for reconsideration.”
- “An ‘objection’ that does nothing more than state a disagreement with a magistrate [judge]'s suggested resolution, or simply summarizes what has been presented before, is not an ‘objection’ as that term is used in this context.”
- “An ‘objection’ that does nothing more than state a disagreement with a magistrate [judge]'s suggested resolution, or simply summarizes what has been presented before, is not an ‘objection’ as that term is used in this context.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orlofsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- A.K. Stamping Co. v. Instrument Specialties Co.D. New Jersey· 2000-07-19· cited 36×
- Mill Creek Group, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceD. Connecticut· 2001-04-10· cited 26×
- Adel v. Greensprings of Vermont, Inc.D. Vermont· 2005-01-28· cited 6×
- GGI Props., LLC v. City of Millville (In re GGI Props., LLC)D. New Jersey· 2018-06-06· cited 4×
- Beechwood Restorative Care Center v. LeedsW.D. New York· 2012-04-13· cited 4×
- Krys v. AaronD. New Jersey· 2015-05-29· cited 4×
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationD. New Jersey· 2016-01-25· cited 2×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 2,215×
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationThird Circuit· 1994-10-17· cited 1,409×
- Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnThird Circuit· 1977-07-06· cited 412×
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-05-07· cited 310×
- United States v. McGloryThird Circuit· 1992-06-19· cited 264×
- Sherlyn Konstantopoulos and Dimos Konstantopoulos v. Westvaco CorporationThird Circuit· 1997-05-06· cited 212×
- The Lubrizol Corporation v. Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering CompanyThird Circuit· 1991-04-08· cited 204×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1994-09-27· cited 165×
- Florham Park Chevron, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.D. New Jersey· 1988-02-25· cited 135×
- United States v. William P. Reilly, United States of America v. John Patrick DowdThird Circuit· 1994-08-31· cited 130×
- Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-08-01· cited 118×
- Little Egg Harbor Tp. v. BonsangueNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-11-09· cited 116×
- Guarino v. LarsenThird Circuit· 1993-11-30· cited 101×
- Resorts International, Inc. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1992-09-01· cited 92×
- Bermingham v. Sony Corp. of America, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1993-03-19· cited 78×
- G-69 v. DegnanD. New Jersey· 1990-10-17· cited 71×
- Lawrence Bushman and Gwenyth Bushman v. Henry J. Halm and United States of AmericaThird Circuit· 1986-08-15· cited 70×
- Reed v. BinderD. New Jersey· 1996-03-27· cited 69×
- Marian Gorlikowski v. Richard B. Tolbert, II and J.W. Express, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1995-04-12· cited 64×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.