Lentz v. City of Cleveland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the city was immune from liability on the plaintiff police officer’s malicious prosecution and abuse of process claims because they did not arise out of the employment relationship
• no causal relationship between police officer’s assignment to gym duty and his protected activity where his assignment to gym duty predated his protected conduct
• “[L]ost opportunities for overtime and secondary employment constitute adverse employment actions.”
• \[L]ost opportunities for overtime and secondary employment constitute adverse employment actions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).