LENSON RUSSELL WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[m]ost of the safeguards provided for in Daubert are not as essential in a case such as this where a district judge sits as the trier of fact in place of a jury”
• finding the standards announced in Daubert “are not as essential in a case . . . where a district judge sits as the trier of fact in place of a jury”
• observing expert testimony standards “are not as essential” in a bench trial
• “The guardian ad litem’s presence is necessitated by the litigation and it is his duty to determine policy regarding litigation.”
• \Most of the safeguards provided for in Daubert are not as essential ... where a district judge sits as the trier of fact in place of a jury.\
• “Most of the safeguards provided for in Daubert are not as essential ... where a district judge sits as the trier of fact in place of a jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).