Lenske v. Staatz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court properly declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state law assault and battery claims against his ex-wife
• concluding that plaintiff’s procedural due process rights were not violated “when [officers] transported him to [the hospital] . . . because he was not entitled to a hearing before being taken to a hospital or psychiatric emergency program” under the Mental Hygiene Law
• discuss- ing “the federal law doctrine of qualified immunity” to § 1983 claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).