Lensch v. Armada Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that voicemails are communications that must conform to the 21 disclosure requirements of section 1692e(11)
• finding that notice which threatened criminal charges unlawful because defendant could not have instituted a criminal proceeding since the statute of limitations had run
• collecting authorities, including those within the Ninth 28 1 intelligently applying the “least sophisticated debtor” standard to the underlying facts. See, 2 e.g., Jackson v. ASA Holdings, 751 F. Supp. 2d 91, 99–100 (D.D.C. 2010
• “[a]s a matter of law, this statute 12 wholly contradicts the FDCPA, which states the exact opposite”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).