Skip to main content
· 11/14/2000

Lenox Hill Hospital v. Shalala

Citations

  • 131 F. Supp. 2d 136
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19711
  • 2000 WL 33128262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that because the plaintiff had “an available administrative remedy under the Medicare program,” the court could not exercise jurisdiction under the mandamus statute
  • noting that a district court can consider the administrative record for purpose of a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1)
  • assuming based on the applicable regulation that “the jurisdictional component of the Board’s decision is reviewable by the Administrator”
  • treating Rule 12(b) 5 motion to dismiss filed after answer as a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c)
  • noting that a majority of courts that have addressed the issue have concluded that the PRRB’s denial of a good cause extension does not 8 In reaching its holding, the Circuit analyzed John Muir Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Califano, 457 F. Supp. 848 (N.D. Cal. 1978

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanley S. Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.