Skip to main content
· 2/18/1998

Lenon v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

Citations

  • 136 F.3d 1365
  • 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2601
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1123
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 152
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 2627
  • 1998 WL 65239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the “considerable discretion” granted to the district court under Rule 21
  • “[T]he general rule is that such damages, including lost profits, are not recoverable under public works bond statutes.”
  • “Few decisions address 1 the citizenship of ERISA plans for diversity purposes. Most cases seem to note their status 2 as express trusts and move on.”
  • “[I]t is well-settled that Rule 21 invests district courts with authority to allow a dispensable nondiverse party to be dropped at any time [to preserve diversity jurisdiction], even after judgment has been rendered.”
  • “The other issues—whether a party is indispensable and whether a dispensable party may be dismissed to maintain diversity—depend on the district court's careful exercise of discretion, and we review the court's determinations on those issues for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Henry, Downes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.