Lennerth v. Mendenhall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that intrastate telephone calls were sufficient to implicate the Section 5(a)(1) prohibition because the “use of a telephone is the use of a means of interstate communication” regardless of the intrastate character of the call

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).