Lenis v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen sua sponte
• holding that sua sponte decisions were committed to agency discretion by law and unreviewable by this court
• holding that we lack jurisdiction to review “the BIA’s decision whether to reopen proceedings on its own motion pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)” as that decision “is committed to agency discretion by law”
• “Because these opinions were unpublished . . . they have no precedential value.”
• “[W]e hold that the [board]’s decision whether to reopen proceedings on its own motion pursuant to 8 C.F.R. [section] 1003.2(a) is committed to agency discretion by law” and “we lack jurisdiction to review” such decisions.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).