Skip to main content
· 3/30/1867

Lenheim v. Wilmarding

Citations

  • 55 Pa. 73
  • 1867 Pa. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where there is conflicting testimony, it is the duty of the Board as the ultimate factfinder to resolve the conflict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agnew, Read, Strong, Thompson, Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.