Lenhart v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A new trial is . . . appropriate if the appellant establishes that the incomplete nature of the transcript prevents the appellate court from conducting a meaningful appellate review.\ (quoting State v. Ladson, 373 S.C. 320, 325, 644 S.E.2d 271, 274 (Ct. App. 2007))
• \[T]he reconstructed record must allow for meaningful appellate review.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).