Lenhart v. Cigna Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “grant of nunc pro tunc relief is not designed to provide relief to parties [who had] not followed proper procedure in preserving appellate rights”
• explaining that the failure to file a post-trial motion must not stem from counsel’s negligence or from a failure to anticipate foreseeable circumstances
• “[T]he decision to allow the filing of post-trial motions nunc pro tunc is vested in the sound discretion of the trial court.”
• “[T]he decision to allow the filing of post-trial motions nunc pro tunc is vested in the sound discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).