Skip to main content
· 12/12/2008

Lemus v. HORIZON EXP., INC.

Citations

  • 196 P.3d 1232
  • 2008 WL 5234543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “if there is some limited circumstance in which reverse veil-piercing should be allowed, Lemus’ case certainly is not it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.