Lemon v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to remand where “the record [was] sufficient for appellate review; all of the issues raised [were] issues of law; and we may affirm if [the trial court’s] order can be upheld on any ground”
• stating remand unnecessary where “the record in this matter is sufficient for appellate review; all the issues raised are issues of law; and we may affirm if Common Pleas’ order can be upheld on any ground”
• rejecting the licensee’s claim that the trial court erred in denying the appeal without a supporting opinion and declining to remand, because the record was sufficient for appellate review, the issues raised were questions of law, and this Court may affirm the trial court on any basis
• When a defendant who had his license suspended for refusing to submit to chemical testing under 75 Pa. C.S.[A.] § 1547(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).