Skip to main content
· 8/15/1991

Lemon v. Anadarko Production Co.

Citations

  • 771 F. Supp. 335
  • 115 Oil & Gas Rep. 497
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11772
  • 1991 WL 160739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing title and depiction of the work “does not create any ambiguity as to the alleged infringement at issue”
  • “Because Plaintiffs have not identified a distinct harm stemming from the alleged fraudulent conduct, they have failed to state claims for fraud”
  • “[I]t is not fatal to [the] copyright claim that the Complaint fails to specify how each particular photograph has been infringed”
  • “To the extent that [plaintiff] intends to assert copyright claims regarding these unspecified photographs, that portion of his Complaint is dismissed.”
  • “Because Plaintiffs have not identified a distinct harm stemming from the alleged fraudulent conduct, they have failed to state claims for fraud . . . .”
  • “Plaintiffs need only allege . . . that plaintiff owns the copyrights in those works and that the copyrights have been registered in accordance with the statute[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.