Lemmond v. Sewell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could not maintain a contract claim based upon a physician's failure to use due care because \[t]he law implies a duty on the part of a physician to exercise due care; it does not imply a promise on his part to do so\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brooks v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-06-12· cited 19×
• Bain v. Colbert County Northwest Alabama Health Care Authority
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2017-02-10· cited 9×
• Springhill Nursing Homes, Inc. v. McCurdy
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-09-24· cited 8×
• Citizens Bank & Trust v. LPS National Flood, LLC
  N.D. Alabama· 2014-09-25· cited 8×
• Moore v. Averi
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-09-30· cited 7×
• McCulley v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-03-01· cited 6×
• Reed v. Stempien
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1985-07-19· cited 6×
• Marsh v. St. Margaret's Hospital
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-11-10· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berry v. Druid City Hospital Board
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1976-05-21· cited 51×
• Green v. Hospital Building Auth. of City of Bessemer
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1975-08-21· cited 28×
• McDowell v. Henderson Mining Company
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1963-11-21· cited 20×
• Brown v. Schultz
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1984-09-28· cited 12×
• Bonds v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1979-03-09· cited 8×