Lemmon v. City of San Leandro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts have found donning and doffing to be principal activity under Steiner when occurring at work place
• declining to follow the DOL Memorandum because, at the time, the integral analysis of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s (“Ninth Circuit”) did not depend on the location of the activity
• refusing to “inject a location limitation into the analysis for finding compensability under the FLSA” in light of the fact that there is no requirement in the Ninth Circuit that integral and indispensable activities take place on the employers’s premises
• ʺ[W]hen determining if the uniform is necessary to the work of a 13 police officer, it is of great consequence that these ʹclothesʹ are of a particular 14 color and design that afford the wearer special powers and deference in our 15 society.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).