Lemke v. Sutter Roseville Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To be sure, if plaintiff is able to prevail on its fraudulent inducement claim and its request for rescission, the 2008 agreements (and the releases contained therein) may be rendered void.”
• “To state a claim for fraudulent inducement, there must be a knowing misrepresentation of material present fact, which is intended to deceive another party and induce that party to act on it, resulting in injury.”
• “[A] misrepresentation of present facts, unlike a mis- representation of future intent to perform under the contract, is collateral to the contract, even though it may have induced the plaintiff to sign it, and therefore involves a separate breach of duty.”
• “[A] misrepresentation of present facts, unlike a mis- representation of future intent to perform under the contract, is collateral to the contract, even though it may have induced the plaintiff to sign it, and therefore involves a separate breach of duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).