Lemelledo v. Beneficial Management Corp. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sale and provision of consumer credit constitutes “merchandise” under N.J.S.A. 56:8 — 1(c)
• holding that the NJCFA applies to the offering, sale or provision of consumer credit—here, $1,000.00 loan for the education of plaintiff's daughter
• concluding that CFA terms are broad enough to include sale of credit and insurance
• holding that “[t]he mere denial of insurance benefits to which . . . plaintiffs believe[ ] they [are] entitled does not comprise an unconscionable commercial practice”
• holding that the CFA is applicable to a financial services company
• finding that existence of other regulatory schemes regarding practices of financial institutions presents no limit on applicability of CFA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).