Leman v. Zuppardo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing appellants' one issue even though appellants failed to include a statement of issues involved in accordance with Rule 2116(a) in their substituted brief en banc ; noting that the required statement was included in the original brief to the merits panel
• work-product privilege applies to communications sent by a lawyer to a witness in order to prepare that witness for trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).