Skip to main content
· 6/19/1991

Leman v. State

Citations

  • 807 S.W.2d 408
  • 1991 WL 33031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • double jeopardy was not raised because nothing indicates the State cannot prove the subsequent offense without relying on conduct used to prove the offense for which defendant had already been convicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Sears, Draughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.