· 6/19/1991
Leman v. State
Citations
- 807 S.W.2d 408
- 1991 WL 33031
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- double jeopardy was not raised because nothing indicates the State cannot prove the subsequent offense without relying on conduct used to prove the offense for which defendant had already been convicted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Sears, Draughn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.