Leland Properties, Inc. v. Burton Engineering & Survey Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “there may have been an ‘irregularity’ in the proceedings in the sense that the trial court inadvertently did not follow its usual practice”
• “Few principles are more time honored in our jury system than the rule that affidavits of jurors will not be considered as evidence to impeach the jury’s verdict.”
• to warrant the allowance of a new trial under ORCP 64 B(1), an “irregularity” must be “sufficient to amount to reversible error in the proceedings” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).