Leland J. Seyler and Aileene Seyler, Husband and Wife v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that nothing in the record demonstrated that the failure to post speed limits on an Indian reservation road actually resulted from a policy decision
• finding that the discretionary function exception did not apply when the government failed to erect speed limit signs on “a two-lane, paved public highway”
• noting that nothing in the record demonstrated that the failure to post speed limits on an Indian reservation road actually resulted from a policy decision
• stating \we doubt that any decision not to provide adequate signs would be of the nature and quality that Congress intended to shield from tort liability\
• stating “we doubt that any decision not to provide adequate signs would be of the nature and quality that Congress intended to shield from tort liability”
• failure to place speed limit sign on reservation road not a policy judgment and thus not covered by discretionary function exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).