Skip to main content
· 3/25/1890

Leitner v. Metz

Citations

  • 32 S.C. 383
  • 10 S.E. 1082
  • 1890 S.C. LEXIS 55

Syllabus

<p>1. A judgment obtained in 1867 and revived by default by order passed more than 20 years afterwards, but under proceedings to revive instituted within the 20 years, retains its lien, and a sale of the debtor’s land thereunder is a valid sale.</p> <p>2. Under summons to show cause why execution on a judgment (describing it) should not be renewed, and under order giving leave to issue a renewal execution on said judgment, the judgment is also revived.</p> <p>3. A judgment obtained against intestate was legally revived under proceedings against the administrator of intestate's derelict estate, oven though the heirs of intestate, who wore in possession of all his lands, had no notice of such proceedings.</p>

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.