Leitgen v. Franciscan Skemp Healthcare, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no inference of retaliation based on suspicious timing because the plaintiff’s alleged protected conduct came after decisionmakers “began discussing ways to discipline” the plaintiff
• affirming summary judgment even though alleged retaliation occurred “just days” after engaging in protected activity
• complaining about action plaintiff believes in good faith is discriminatory constitutes protected conduct
• complaining about action plaintiff believes in good faith is discriminatory constitutes protected conduct
• “A claim of retaliation based on suspicious timing depends on what the relevant decision-makers knew and when....”
• “There is no dispute that [the plaintiff’s] forced resignation constitutes an adverse employment action ….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).