Skip to main content
· 3/30/1992

Leisure v. Leisure

Citations

  • 589 N.E.2d 1163
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 471
  • 1992 WL 58804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant's motion for change of judge where the appellant failed to demonstrate actual bias

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Sullivan, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.