Leisure Resorts, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to \imply [a term] where it ha[d] been excluded\ when the term was used in one section but not another
• declining to \imply [a term] where it has been excluded\ when the term was used in one section governing the implied warranty for developers but not another implied-warranty section governing contractors
• declining to \imply [a term] where it has been excluded\ when the term was used in one section governing the implied warranty for developers but not another implied-warranty section governing contractors
• declining to “imply [a term] where it has been excluded” when the term was used in one section governing the implied warranty 3 for developers but not another implied-warranty section governing contractors
• “Having accepted jurisdiction, we may review the district court’s decision for any error.”
• “When the legislature has used a term . . . in one section of the statute but omits it in another section of the same statute, we will not imply it where it has been excluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).