Leimbach v. Lane (In Re Lane)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiff must initially show that a specific asset is missing . . . [i]f the creditor identifies a missing asset, it is incumbent upon a debtor to provide a satisfactory explanation concerning what happened to that asset.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).