Leigh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing “the defendant knew the substance was cocaine” as an element of trafficking, when the appellant’s offense occurred after the enactment of section 893.101
• “In order [t]o establish a conspiracy and appellant's participation in it, the state must prove an express or implied agreement or understanding between two or more persons to commit a criminal offense, and an intention to commit that offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schlicher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-17· cited 10×
• Hernandez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-12-09· cited 8×
• Vasquez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-17· cited 6×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-27· cited 4×
• Dieujuste v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-02· cited 2×
• Charlie Wyne v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29· cited 1×
• State v. Powell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-20· cited 1×
• Byron Turner v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-12

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-05· cited 49×
• Concepcion v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-03· cited 20×
• Snell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-25· cited 18×
• Pino v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-15· cited 17×
• Jordan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-23· cited 14×
• Sheriff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-17· cited 10×
• Arguelles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-19· cited 10×
• Christie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-29· cited 8×