Leib v. Hillsborough County Public Transportation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dormant Commerce Clause complaint by in-state resident against municipality failed on merits because challenged rule regulated even-handedly and did not burden interstate commerce
• concluding that a challenged ordinance “easily” survives rational basis review based at the motion to dismiss stage
• holding that dormant Commerce Clause complaint by in-state resident against municipality failed on merits because challenged rule regulated even-handedly and did not burden interstate commerce
• holding that “complete lack of factual detail regarding the ‘similarly situated’ requirement” required dismissal of class-of-one equal protection claim
• holding that a civil statute regarding permitting met the less strict vagueness standard
• emphasizing that the “similarly situated” requirement “must be rigorously applied in the context of ‘class of one’ claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).