Lehnerd v. Habada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taxing costs for video deposition editing to the defendant in light Of their failure to object
• “Plaintiff correctly predicted Defendant would use his deposition for impeachment purposes. Thus, it was reasonably necessary for Plaintiff to possess a copy of the deposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).