· 10/16/2009
LEHMKUHLE v. State
Citations
- 20 So. 3d 971
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15622
- 2009 WL 3320185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant was entitled to a hearing on his presentence oral motion to withdraw plea
- defendant entitled to be heard on his presentence motion to withdraw plea made during sentencing hearing
- \The trial court here should have given Lehmkuhle an opportunity to be heard before ruling on his motion.\
- \The trial court here should have given Lehmkuhle an opportunity to be heard before ruling on his motion.\
- “[T]he trial court here should have given Lehm-kuhle an opportunity to be heard before ruling on his motion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Casanueva, Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.