Skip to main content
· 10/16/2009

LEHMKUHLE v. State

Citations

  • 20 So. 3d 971
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15622
  • 2009 WL 3320185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant was entitled to a hearing on his presentence oral motion to withdraw plea
  • defendant entitled to be heard on his presentence motion to withdraw plea made during sentencing hearing
  • \The trial court here should have given Lehmkuhle an opportunity to be heard before ruling on his motion.\
  • \The trial court here should have given Lehmkuhle an opportunity to be heard before ruling on his motion.\
  • “[T]he trial court here should have given Lehm-kuhle an opportunity to be heard before ruling on his motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Casanueva, Altenbernd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.