Skip to main content
· 7/1/1879

Lehmberg v. Biberstein

Citations

  • 51 Tex. 457

Syllabus

<p>1. Fraud—Fraudulent conveyance.—As a general rule, a deed cannot be attacked for fraud by a creditor whose claim originates after the execution of the deed, or who acquires the claim with notice of the conveyance.</p> <p>2. Venue.—A suit brought to procure a decree to cancel a deed for fraud in its execution, may be properly instituted in the county of defendant’s residence, without regard to the locality of the land conveyed.</p> <p>3. Oases approved.—Vandever v. Freeman, 20 Tex., 336, approved.</p> <p>4. Fact cases.—See issue of fact, arising on pleading alleging fraud in a conveyance, which should have been submitted to the jury.</p>

Judges: Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.