· 1/28/1997
Legault v. Zambarano
Citations
- 105 F.3d 24
- 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1229
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1349
- 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,632
- 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1652
- 1997 WL 24339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 11 applied to a letter sent with the intent to influence the court with respect to injunctive relief
- holding that Rule 11 applied to a letter sent with the intent to influence the court with respect to injunctive relief
- holding that because a federal prisoner’s job fulfilled a prison work requirement, he was not an “employee” who could enforce the “whistleblower protection 25 provisions” of the Clean Air Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act
- applying purposeful direction test to a California tort claim of 28 wrongful termination in violation of public policy
- sanctions were appropriate where letter was sent “with the intent to influence the court” in court’s determination of whether to grant injunctive relief
- the bankruptcy judge who has presided 27 over a case from its inception is in the best position to clarify 28 the court’s rulings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cyr, Boudin, Ponsor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.