Skip to main content
· 1/28/1997

Legault v. Zambarano

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 24
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1229
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1349
  • 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,632
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1652
  • 1997 WL 24339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 11 applied to a letter sent with the intent to influence the court with respect to injunctive relief
  • holding that Rule 11 applied to a letter sent with the intent to influence the court with respect to injunctive relief
  • holding that because a federal prisoner’s job fulfilled a prison work requirement, he was not an “employee” who could enforce the “whistleblower protection 25 provisions” of the Clean Air Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act
  • applying purposeful direction test to a California tort claim of 28 wrongful termination in violation of public policy
  • sanctions were appropriate where letter was sent “with the intent to influence the court” in court’s determination of whether to grant injunctive relief
  • the bankruptcy judge who has presided 27 over a case from its inception is in the best position to clarify 28 the court’s rulings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cyr, Boudin, Ponsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.