Lefton v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, though plaintiff's concerns were both “real” and “understandable,” they were not compensable under Texas law
• explaining that, though plaintiff’s concerns were both “real” and “understandable,” they were not compensable under Texas law
• remanding for new trial on economic damages and mental anguish damages, but affirming attorney fee award
• discussing preservation, court noted expert testimony that is nonprobative on its face, such as testimony that is conclusory or speculative, constitutes no evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).