Leffler Co. v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a claim under New York's consumer protection statute \should be assessed with reference to [the] AGC factors\
• dismissing claim by consumers of food products against defendants who fixed prices of additives used to extend food’s shelf life
• “Language in the statute that it shall ‘take effect immediately’ does not support retroactive application.”
• “Language in the statute that it shall ‘take effect immediately’ does not support retroactive application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).