Skip to main content
· 3/12/1894

Leedom v. Leedom

Citations

  • 160 Pa. 273
  • 28 A. 1024
  • 1894 Pa. LEXIS 804

Syllabus

<p>Evidence — Declarations of husband against wife.</p> <p>The declarations of a husband made in the absence of his wife are not admissible against the wife.</p> <p>Evidence — Gi'oss-examinatihn.</p> <p>The contradiction of plaintiff’s own testimony is a matter of defence which cannot be introduced upon cross-examination of plaintiff’s witness.</p> <p>Evidence — Employment of counsel by defendant.</p> <p>In an action of assumpsit it is proper to permit plaintiff to show by defendant, on cross-examination, that defendant did not himself employ counsel to defend the case. , j</p>

Judges: Dean, Green, McCollum, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.