Leebrick v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence raised only a strong suspicion of guilt even when the stolen items were found hidden under a porch where the defendants had slept
• holding that where stolen property was located under a porch where the defendants slept, the evidence “falls far short of proving that the defendants ... had exclusive possession of, or claimed a property interest in ... any of the stolen articles”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).