Skip to main content
· 10/11/1966

Leeb v. Read

Citations

  • 190 So. 2d 830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the Prince principle to hold that evidentiary errors made during a bench trial did not affect the substantial rights of the complaining party
  • “It is established in Florida that an appellate court is not warranted in disturbing the trial judge’s findings in a non-jury law case unless they are clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll and Swann, Jj., and Boyer, Tyrie A., Associate Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.