Lee Wayne Haynes v. J. D. Harris, Warden, Medical Center for Federal Prisoners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when movant filed his § 2255 motion, his direct appeal was “presently pending before the Court of Appeals,” and thus he was “not entitled to habeas corpus”
• explaining that when movant filed his § 2255 motion, his direct appeal was “presently pending before the Court of Appeals,” and thus he was “not entitled to habeas corpus”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).